PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO CONTINUE READING.
Your subscription is important and supports our editorial integrity. Advertisers are sometimes afraid of being associated with controversial news topics, and your subscription is vital to ensuring we can continue to publish the courageous news we are known and respected for.
Get Insider Access and Expert Analysis Today
or Log In
Join our community. To comment on this article please join/login. Here's a sample of the comments on this post.
"eluding" should be "alluding"
From what I understand, we had a cordon set around Mosul and granted them safe passage to withdraw from the city. They primary "why" is easy: less fighters to deal with inside the city itself, but it is unclear what the second and third order effects of that are.
I started reading some of the major European papers and don't like what I am reading regarding US strategy. Here in the states we are reading and seeing who goes up to Trump Tower. I think Trump needs to be at his daily briefings "Daily". He may have the shortest 100 day honeymoon in Presidential history.
Did we (U.S.) provide ISIS safe passage on purpose, to redirect their attacks to Syria? (If we can control a region sufficiently to provide safe passage, surely we know who we are protecting in that passage, yeah?)
So if I am reading this correctly: We have been fighting ISIS in Iraq in the city of Mosul yet they escape the attack and now position themselves some 700 km down the road in Palmyra SYRIA and no one sees this movement of 5,000 ISIS troops. Who is helping ISIS make this great strategic movement? It sure is not Russia or Syria.