PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO CONTINUE READING.
Your subscription is important and supports our editorial integrity. Advertisers are sometimes afraid of being associated with controversial news topics, and your subscription is vital to ensuring we can continue to publish the courageous news we are known and respected for.
Get Insider Access and Expert Analysis Today
or Log In
Join our community. To comment on this article please join/login. Here's a sample of the comments on this post.
Sam, Was there some sort of conflict with the Station Chief in Iraq and teams like yours leading up to, and in the initial phases of the invasion?
Excellent article, well thought out. I agree with most of your conclusions. The DNI is a bloated administrative nightmare, the idea was to improve intelligence coordination but it's implementation was not well thought out. In many ways the CIA had become what the DNI was supposed to solve but failed to do so. I do not agree that strategic intelligence capability should be stripped from the military. However, it does need to be cleaned up. Thanks again for a great article. JimJ
Mr. Faddis, another insightful, informative article. Simply outstanding. Well done Sir.
Excellent read. I wish a distinction was made between leadership of the various intelligence outfits and the bulk of the people doing the work day-in and day-out. The recent issues are being framed as "Trump vs the entire community" as opposed to "Trump vs a selected group from the community". Brennan, Clapper, and ilk are neither sacred nor infallible. If it takes a public upbraiding to change the culture at the top of these orgs, then so be it. What results should you expect when you let career bureaucrats run the show?
Great article on the CIA these folks are protecting not just US either.