Sections

Gear

Sig Sauer P226 vs Beretta 92FS

by ·

These two pistols are icons in the gun community. The Beretta 92FS and the Sig Sauer P226 have served reliably around the world with distinction. We have learned several things about them and handguns in general as far as what it takes to make a reliable pistol that anyone can enjoy or use in a duty role.

PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO CONTINUE READING.

Your subscription is important and supports our editorial integrity. Advertisers are sometimes afraid of being associated with controversial news topics, and your subscription is vital to ensuring we can continue to publish the courageous news we are known and respected for.

Get Insider Access and Expert Analysis Today

SUBSCRIBE NOW

or Log In

BECAUSE, FACTS DON'T TAKE SIDES

Your Subscription Supports Honest News Efforts

TRY 4 WEEKS FOR $1.99

Comments

Join our community. To comment on this article please join/login. Here's a sample of the comments on this post.

  • VeteranDan

    I loved both the M9 and P226N but carry a G19 simply on weight and dependability. Not knocking on the Sig or Beretta... I just never had a FTF with my G19s.

  • Patrick G

    I love my Sig 226 but would also love to own a 92 FS. I prefer the "G" model with the decocker only instead of the saftey. I believe you can switch these out fairly easily.

  • Thomas S

    Oddly enough I have come to like versions of these firearms made by other companies more than either of the originals. With the Sig P226 I have found the Arex Zero1 to be an improved copy. The adjustments to the controls just make it easier to use. As to the 92FS I have long owned both it and a Taurus PT92. The PT92 has always been my prefered between the two. It has an improved safety position as well as features such as an accessory rail, a feature missing from the Beretta until recently. If I were to rely on one for my life it would probably the the Arex.

  • Antonio A

    Sig P226, Th3 FS92 and 96 just didn't feel right. My personal experience.