PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO CONTINUE READING.
Your subscription is important and supports our editorial integrity. Advertisers are sometimes afraid of being associated with controversial news topics, and your subscription is vital to ensuring we can continue to publish the courageous news we are known and respected for.
Get Insider Access and Expert Analysis Today
or Log In
Join our community. To comment on this article please join/login.
Here’s a sample of the comments on this post.
So one has to wonder what the issue protocols are for ACOGs? Does every marine get one? could the old “serviceable” units that have depleted trintium be issued to recruits who will only see range time?
marines are combat effective with their arms
As a matter of tradition, I believe all shooters should learn irons first, but red dots (et al.) are such a force multiplier that I believe it would be exceptionally ill-advised to move away from them. They are wearing out not just because they are used (read as: return on investment) but also because most of them were bought at the height of GWOT and that tritium ain’t gonna irradiate itself…half-lives are a mother. This has a simple solution that I virtually never turn to: throw money at the problem. Unless there’s a war on, Trij will not have three shifts making them again, but keeping a steady stream really shouldn’t be that difficult.
For the record, in the Army (GWOT days) I didn’t have anything except irons.
Army side here. We used CCO as more of a standard issue optic but do have ACOGs as well. I liked having an ACOG for hitting longer range targets and the CCO was nice for fast transitioning targets. They are pretty sturdy and easy to adjust. We still have to zero with iron sites and the optic.
No pun intended?