PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO CONTINUE READING.
Your subscription is important and supports our editorial integrity. Advertisers are sometimes afraid of being associated with controversial news topics, and your subscription is vital to ensuring we can continue to publish the courageous news we are known and respected for.
Get Insider Access and Expert Analysis Today
or Log In
Join our community. To comment on this article please join/login.
Here’s a sample of the comments on this post.
.
…Europe prepares:Â Included, Operation Dynamic Mongoose…
.
http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/europe-puts-its-finger-on-the-trigger/ar-AAdgUQR?ocid=mailsignout
.
-YP-
http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/putin-%E2%80%98beat-ex-wife-and-had-secret-facelift%E2%80%99-claims-sensational-documentary/ar-BBhNXlW
.
-YP-
https://twitter.com/BrandonTWebb so what would a NATO asymmetric plan look like from your perspective? would it be a simple change in policy or require a delicate and precision build-up?
Well said and concise analysis, Brandon. Cheers.
asimd It depends on what part of the Ukraine we’re talking about. The Crimea is definitely populated with people who have a strong Russian bias. I don’t think that, left on their own, they would have merged back into Russia, but, having been, at least in their opinion, forcibly restrained from forming a separate territory, the majority is happy to run back to Mother Russia.
But the Crimea is not the Ukraine. And many Ukrainians who have hated the Russians for generations, because the Soviets were hardly the first to believe that the Ukraine belonged to them by right as well as might.
This area has a long, long history of unhappy interaction, and there is no way that this is going to end well.